Why I Like David Icke Better than Ken Wilber

Note: I wrote the following article as an experiment with an article distribution service. A client wanted ten article distributed through this service and the service offered one extra free submission, so I took it. It has been viewed almost 400 times there, while those I submitted on behalf of my client have been viewed only around 200 times each. Apparently more people are interested in “New Age” thinkers than are interested in buying appliances online.

David Icke and Ken Wilber are two of the most prolific “New Age” writers there are, though neither of them particularly likes the label. In Icke’s case, New Agers are as caught up in the Matrix as anybody else. Wilber likes to identify himself with academics and philosophers and so distances himself from fuzzy headed New Age thinking as much as possible. I can relate to both of these attitudes, but be that as it may, if you go to the bookstore and look for their titles, you will almost certainly find them in the New Age section. Let’s face it, folks – if we’re thinking outside the box, we’re labeled as New Agers whether we wear pastel colored clothes and dance with fairies or not!

I first stumbled across David Icke’s work just after 9/11, when I was trying to find out the facts about that fateful day. Aside from the mainstream stuff, there were a handful of blogs that questioned the official version of the story. Icke’s was one of those blogs. Intrigued by the 9-11 stories he had on his blog, I had a look around to see what he was all about.

In a nutshell, David Icke started out as an ultra-normal British bloke who liked football (soccer) so much he was able to make a career out of it as a television commentator. He was a respected household name in the U.K. until he had a flash of insight and saw that mankind was caught in a hideous matrix of unreality and that we were virtual slaves to a race of reptilian shapeshifters. Instead of keeping this information to himself, he chose to tell the world and in the process became the laughing stock of England. Score one for David Icke! Anybody with enough integrity to put himself on the line like that has to be admired.

Simply because the man had the courage of his convictions and didn’t back down, I gave him the benefit of the doubt and read some more. Although his “Reptilian Shapeshifters” theory was outlandish, I could relate to it on a metaphorical level. I had just begun my studies about the brain and spirituality and was going down a similar path, namely that our “reptile brain” (brain stem and related structures) highjacks our ability to see the bigger picture that our frontal lobes (higher consciousness) have access to. I had also discovered the difference between the way the left brain and the right brain think. David Icke was a right brain thinker. I liked that.

In 2004, I was stuck in the desert in Victorville, California for three months caring for my Dad, who was dying of stomach cancer. There was little I could do for him other than to find him a good hospice, put his affairs in order and pay him a visit every day. For a good chunk of each day and night I had nothing to do. My saving grace was the Victorville Barnes and Noble Bookstore. It was a big, well-stocked store complete with lounge chairs and a Starbuck’s.

I indulged in an orgy of reading while I was there in Victorville and was finally was able to buy a book by David Icke. I chose “Infinite Love is the Only Reality. Everything else is Illusion” because I liked the title.

One day while I was having a coffee in Starbuck’s, a magazine called “What is Enlightenment?” caught my eye. It’s an excellent question, so I picked up a copy and thumbed through it to see what they had to say on the subject. I wasn’t too impressed with the editor’s (Andrew Cohen) opinions, but another regular contributor was a guy named Ken Wilber, who seemed to be pretty intelligent and was billed as “the world’s greatest living philosopher.” After my coffee, I went back inside and looked for a book by that author. When I found nothing in the philosophy section, I asked a sales assistant where I might find his books. I should have known. They were in the New Age section under “W” for Wilber, just a few rows away from “I” for Icke.

After thumbing through a few of them, I purchased “A Brief History of Everything” because it looked liked the best introduction to Wilber’s thinking. I liked the book, but was not blown away by it. He seemed to think a little too highly of himself, but I liked the fact that he wasn’t afraid to think for himself. Wanting to know more about him and what he had to say, I checked out his Integral Naked website.

I was a little disturbed by his website because it seemed to have a cult-like feel to it, in spite of the fact that his readers seemed to be fairly intelligent people who were not cult types. I could live with that, but when Wilber dismissed Walt Whitman as a “nature mystic,” I rebelled. Walt Whitman has been an idol of mine ever since I read “Song of Myself.” These lines in particular hit me right between the eyes way back in 1969 and have stuck with me ever since:

And I know that the hand of God is the promise of my own,
And I know that the spirit of God is the brother of my own,
And that all the men ever born are also my brothers, and the women my sisters and lovers,
And that a kelson of the creation is love

Was Wilber really that dumb? Had this “scholar” never read what Whitman’s contemporaries thought of him? R.M. Bucke, for instance, considered Whitman to be the greatest exemplar of cosmic consciousness who ever lived. Did Wilber really think his version of “Kosmic Consciousness” was superior to Whitman’s?

While Icke and Wilber both have agendas of their own, for some reason I don’t feel like Icke is trying to shove his down my throat. He still doesn’t seem to particularly care if anybody likes him or not. Wilber, on the other hand, seems to want people to like him and writes as if he is trying to impress his imaginary readers rather than writing from the heart. That’s the feeling I get from him, anyway.

So, that’s why I like David Icke better than I like Ken Wilber. I’m nobody, so I’m sure neither of them cares, but I have a feeling that Icke wouldn’t hold my lack of status in the world against me and would welcome me into his home. On the other hand, I get the feeling that Wilber would politely refuse me entry unless I paid the price of admission or was somebody important in his eyes.

About Rob

Born in Southern California, Rob Schneider migrated to Australia in 1985. He is currently living in Sihanoukville, Cambodia, where he works as a freelance content writer.
Tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Why I Like David Icke Better than Ken Wilber

  1. I’m completely with you on this one Rob!
    Icke may have his own issues and while I don’t agree with him 100% on everything, he still strikes me as genuine, that if I were to meet him on the street, he’s be very easy to approach and talk to.
    Wilber on the other hand, seems to be the kind of guy who would have bouncers and bodyguards around him if he could get away with it.

  2. Caroline K. says:

    I completely agree. Wilber has a penchant for philosophy and an expanded brain to match, but like The Wizard of Oz’s Tinman, he doesn’t have a heart. He is all brain with little heart, and the more he aged, the worse it got. I feel no light coming from him these days to the point where I am almost creeped out by him.

    Pinnacles come and go in life, and as we age we are not concerned with pinnacles because it is not a part of growing older, but if we have faced our challenges in life honestly, we will be rewarded with wisdom, but wisdom is not an intellectual pursuit. It is a grace that comes from being honest with oneself in one’s efforts to evolve/grow and heal as a human being, and face one’s challenges as best one can by not running from them and consciously working on them.

    It truly is a hero’s journey for both men and women, and not without obstacles.

    Ken is human like the rest of us and maybe he cannot accept that for himself or remember that a heart is a thing of beauty, but we always remain at the crossroads of change as long as we are alive. Redemption is always at hand. I don’t envy his path, and I hope, since he followed the path he did, that he finds some redemption or humility because that would reconcile him enough to allow peace into his life and the grace of wisdom if it is not too late.

    I also think the Age of Intellect has become passe, and that we have already entered the Age of the Heart and Intuitivism, and this will allow the brain to take its proper place in the scheme of human life and a balance to occur.

    David Icke fits in well and has stayed afloat through the years because he has a lion’s heart and a sense of humor that reconciles him to all circumstances.

    • Rob says:

      Thank you for your thoughtful comment. I agree that it’s time for a shift in consciousness from the intellect to the heart and maybe it is occurring. It’s certainly encouraging that people are responding to heart-centred teachings now more than in the past, when “abundance” gurus were all the rage.

  3. Thank you for any other informative website. The place else may I get that kind of info written in such a perfect manner? I have a undertaking that I am simply now operating on, and I have been at the glance out for such info.

  4. Bright says:

    This blog along with its responses has really shone light helping me discern. Bombardment of polished advertisements for Wilber was already the clue. I had been with people who are all about just brains and don’t wish to connect there again! Thank you so much all of you who wrote and shared here!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>